ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE. Teacher Performance Appraisal
|
|
|
- Edmund Spencer
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE HR113 Teacher Performance Appraisal Board Received: Review Date: Accountability: 1. Frequency of Reports As needed 2. Severity Threshold As needed (eg. Changes in Ministry guidelines/collective agreements) 3. Criteria for Success Process enhances job performance and the learning environment. Procedures 1. Experienced Teachers a) Annual Learning Plans i) The Grand Erie District School Board will ensure that every teacher employed by the Board has an Annual Learning Plan (ALP) (see Appendix A) that addresses the teacher s own professional growth. ii) The teacher must prepare a learning plan every year in consultation with the appropriate principal and submit it by October 15 th. iii) All learning plans must include the teacher s professional growth objectives as well as his or her proposed action plan and timelines for achieving those objectives. iv) In the teacher s evaluation year, the teacher and principal must review and update the teacher s current ALP in a meeting as part of the performance appraisal process. The preobservation and post-observation meetings provide opportunities for this review to take place. b) Teacher Performance Appraisals i) Teacher performance appraisals are to be conducted using the timelines and procedures as outlined in the Education Act, Regulations and the document entitled, Performance Appraisal of Experienced Teachers Technical Requirements Manual. ii) Principals must conduct a minimum of one performance appraisal for each experienced teacher in their year of review. iii) The principal must notify all teachers for whom performance appraisals will be conducted within the first 20 school days of the school year. iv) If necessary, the provision for missed timelines in Section of the Education Act may be applied. c) Documentation Requirements i) Every person who conducts a performance appraisal of a teacher shall submit a copy of the summative report and the Annual Learning Plan to the Family of Schools Superintendent for inclusion in the human resources file of the teacher. Teachers who have had a performance appraisal will receive a copy of the signed Summative Report.
2 HR113 Teacher Performance Appraisal Page 2 ii) Human Resources Services will retain a copy of each performance appraisal record for at least six years from the date of the summative report. 2. Teachers New to the Profession a) Definition Teachers newly hired by the Board into permanent contract positions (full-time or part-time) to begin teaching for the first time in the province of Ontario. b) Teacher Performance Appraisals i) Teacher performance appraisals are to be conducted using the timelines and procedures as outlined in the Education Act, Regulations and the document entitled, Manual for Performance Appraisal of New Teachers. ii) Principals must conduct two performance appraisals in the first 12 months that a teacher new to the profession is employed. For teachers who do not receive two performance appraisals with satisfactory ratings in the first 12 months after they begin teaching, additional evaluation(s) will occur in a second 12 month period. iii) Where a teacher is teaching in only one semester, both evaluations will be completed during that one semester. iv) Where a teacher is assigned to semester one in a school and semester two in another school, one performance appraisal shall be completed in each school during the teacher s initial 12 months of employment. c) Documentation Requirements i) Every person who conducts a performance appraisal of a teacher shall immediately submit a copy of the summative report to the Family of Schools Superintendent for inclusion in the human resources file of the teacher. ii) After two satisfactory performance appraisals have been completed within the first 12 months of teaching, and the teacher has participated in the New Teacher Induction Program (orientation, mentoring, professional development and training), the principal shall complete an Individual Strategy Form (Appendix D). The form is submitted to Human Resources Services and the performance appraisals to their Family of Schools Superintendent, who will then forward them to Human Resources Services. iii) Human Resources Services shall notify the Ontario College of Teachers that the teacher has successfully completed the New Teacher Induction Program within 60 calendar days iv) of completion. Human Resources Services will retain a copy of each performance appraisal record for at least six years from the date of the summative report. v) When a principal is considering employing a teacher from another Board, prior to any job offer, the principal shall contact Human Resources Services who will contact the last Board that employed the teacher, if any, to request the following: information about the elements of the New Teacher Induction Program that the teacher was required to participate in at the board in accordance with section 270 of the Education Act and O. Reg 266/06; copies of the performance appraisal documents that are in possession of the board that relate to performance appraisals of the teacher conducted by the board; copies of all documents relied on in conducting performance appraisals of the teacher;
3 HR113 Teacher Performance Appraisal Page 3 copies of any Enrichment Plan prepared for the teacher under clause (2)(g) of the Act and any Improvement Plan prepared for the teacher under clause (2)(g) of the Act; copies of any documents relating to the termination of the employment of the teacher or to a recommendation for the termination of the employment that are in the possession of the board and that, in the opinion of the board, may be relevant to the decision of the requesting board; copies of any documents relating to the teacher s resignation while on review status 3. Teachers New to the Board (but not new to the profession) a) Definition Teachers newly hired by the Board into permanent contract positions (full-time or part-time) who have previous permanent teaching experience with another Board in the province of Ontario. b) Teacher Performance Appraisals i) Teacher performance appraisals are to be conducted using the timelines and procedures as outlined in the Education Act and Regulations. ii) Principals must conduct at least one performance appraisal in the first year that a teacher is employed. c) Documentation Requirements i) Every person who conducts a performance appraisal of a teacher shall submit a copy of the summative report (and the Annual Learning Plan with the first report) to the Family of Schools Superintendent for inclusion in the human resources file of the teacher. ii) Human Resources Services will retain a copy of each performance appraisal record for at least six years from the date of the summative report. iii) When a principal is considering employing a teacher from another Board, the principal shall conduct appropriate reference checks with the teacher s former principal and/or vice-principal using the approved Reference Check Form. Completion of the Reference Check Form will indicate if the teacher had a recent Teacher Performance Appraisal and what the rating was. Prior to making any job offer, the principal shall contact Human Resources Services who, if necessary, will then contact the last Board that employed the teacher to request the following: Copies of the performance appraisal document and all other documents relied on in conducting the last two performance appraisals of the teacher, if either of those appraisals resulted in an unsatisfactory rating. Copies of any documents relating to the termination of the teacher s employment or to a recommendation for the termination of the teacher s employment that are in the possession of the Board and that, in the opinion of the Board, may be relevant to the decision of the requesting Board. Copies of any documents relating to the teacher s resignation while on review status that are in the possession of the Board and that, in the opinion of the Board, may be relevant to the decision 4. Duties and Powers re: Performance Appraisals
4 HR113 Teacher Performance Appraisal Page 4 a) The principal assigned to the school to which the teacher is assigned must conduct the performance appraisals in the teacher s evaluation year unless the responsibility is delegated to the vice-principal. b) Duties or powers of a principal shall be performed or exercised by the Family of Schools Superintendent where: i) the principal and Superintendent agree that the Superintendent shall perform the duty or exercise the power. ii) the Family of Schools Superintendent is of the opinion that the principal is unable to perform the duty or exercise the power in a timely way because of absence or some other reason. c) The duty or power of the Family of Schools Superintendent may be performed or exercised by another Superintendent employed by the Board where the Superintendent who would ordinarily perform the duty or exercise the power is unable to do so in a timely way because of absence or some other reason. d) When a series of one or more performance appraisals are to be conducted as part of a process, the effect of each of the appraisals is the same regardless of whether the duties or powers in relation to different appraisals are performed or exercised by different individuals or individuals holding different titles. e) Where a teacher is assigned to teach part-time in each of two schools, the performance appraisal will be completed by the principal of the teacher s designated home school. f) Performance appraisals for itinerant teachers, teacher-consultants and coordinators will involve observing the mandated competencies in situations such as the delivery of workshops, program meetings, parent/student conferences and the teaching of sample lessons. g) Performance appraisals of all teacher support staff (i.e. Program Coordinators, Teacher Consultants or itinerant teachers) will be completed by the appropriate Principal Leader or Superintendent. 5. Parent and Student Surveys Teachers are encouraged to gather parent and student input in developing, reviewing, and updating their ALP each year. Seeking parental and student input is an important vehicle for informing a teacher s professional learning and teaching practice. Attached are Appendix B Parent Input Survey and Appendix C Student Input Survey, for those teachers who wish to use them to gather input. 6. Accountability a) In order to ensure compliance with all timelines provided in the teacher performance appraisal process, Family of Schools Superintendent will communicate with each of their principals by both January 31 and May 31 of each school year and will review the progress of the performance appraisals. b) Principals who do not comply with the timelines and procedures outlined in the teacher performance appraisal process will be subject to disciplinary procedures (as outlined in HR119 Progressive Discipline) implemented by the Family of Schools Superintendent. c) The Director of Education has overall responsibility for ensuring that performance appraisals are conducted according to the acts, regulations and Board policies and procedures.
5 HR113 Teacher Performance Appraisal Page 5 Annual Learning Plan (ALP) Appendix A Teacher s Last Name Teacher s First Name Principal s Last Name Principal s First Name Name of School Name of Board Description of Teacher s Assignment (Grade[s], Subject[s], Full-time/Part-time, Elementary/ Secondary, etc.) Background to Inform Professional Growth Goals, Action Plan, and Timelines Recommended professional growth goals and strategies from the summative report of my most recent performance appraisal: Professional learning and growth that I have experienced over the past year(s): Parental and student input to inform my professional learning and teaching practice (optional):
6 HR113 Teacher Performance Appraisal Page 6 Professional Growth Goals Professional Growth Strategies to Help Reach Goals Rationale for Professional Growth Goals and Strategies Action Plan and Timelines Other Comments (Teacher) Other Comments (Principal) Date of Next Review and Update of the Annual Learning Plan (yyyy/mm/dd) Principal s signature) My signature indicates that the teacher has consulted with me to review and update the Annual Learning Plan. Date (yyyy/mm/dd) Teacher s Signature My signature indicates that I reviewed and updated the Annual Learning Plan in consultation with my principal. Date (yyyy/mm/dd)
7 HR113 Teacher Performance Appraisal Page 7 GRAND ERIE DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD PARENT INPUT SURVEY TEACHER PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Appendix B School Date Teacher Day/Month/Year Student Course Code (Secondary) Grade/Subject (Elementary) To support exemplary teaching and learning, teachers are encouraged to ask for parental input. This input must focus on your level of satisfaction with communication about your child s learning and progress. The Teacher 1. Strongly Disagree 2. Disagree 3. Agree 4. Strongly Agree 1 Provides ongoing feedback to me through newsletters, bulletins, etc. 2 Demonstrates a positive, professional attitude when communicating with pupils, colleagues and me. 3 Follows school/board guidelines on reporting with dilegence. 4 Conducts teacher parent conferences. 5 Communicates clear, challenging and achievable expectations for pupils. Have you participated in a parent/teacher interview this year? Yes No Not Applicable Did you return page 3 of your child s report card? Yes No Not Applicable Please add any additional comments in the space below regarding my communication: Completed by: Signature: (Print Name) (Only signed forms are to be submitted) Please return this form to my attention by: Teacher s signature:
8 HR113 Teacher Performance Appraisal Page 8 GRAND ERIE DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD STUDENT INPUT SURVEY TEACHER PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Appendix C School Date Teacher Day/Month/Year Student Course Code (Secondary) Grade/Subject (Elementary) To support exemplary teaching and learning, teachers are encouraged to ask for student input. This input must focus on student/teacher communication and whether I effectively promote student learning. The Teacher 1. Strongly Disagree 2. Disagree 3. Agree 4. Strongly Agree 1 Demonstrates commitment to my well being and development. 2 Treats all pupils equitably and with respect. 3 Establishes an environment that maximizes learning. 4 Uses appropriate strategies to manage discipline 5 Engages in meaningful dialogue with pupils to provide feedback during the teaching/learning process. 6 Develops clear and achievable classroom expectations. Please add any additional comments in the space below regarding my communication and whether I effectively promote student learning: Completed by: Signature: (Print Name) (Only signed forms are to be submitted) Please return this form to my attention by: Teacher s signature:
9 HR113 Teacher Performance Appraisal Page 9 Appendix D INDIVIDUAL NTIP STRATEGY FORM Name: New Teacher Induction Program (NTIP) Elements Orientation Goals Strategies Principal Initials* Board level School level Professional Development and Training Classroom Management Planning, Assessment and Evaluation Communication with Parents Teaching Students with Special Needs and other Diverse Learners Current Education Priorities (e.g. Literacy and Numeracy strategies, Student Success, Safe Schools, PAL) Mentoring Development of NTIP Individual Strategy with Mentor Mentoring activities (e.g., planning, dialogue, professional development, other) I have participated in the NTIP elements described above. Teacher Signature Date This new teacher has completed two satisfactory teacher performance appraisals and his/her name will be forwarded to the Ontario College of Teachers for NTIP notation. Principal Signature Date * the principal only needs to initial the elements in which the new teacher has participated in the event that the new teacher transfers schools/boards before completing the NTIP.
Teacher Performance Appraisal. Frequently Asked Questions. Table of Contents. Classroom Observation & Pre- and Post-Observation Meetings 9
Teacher Performance Appraisal Frequently Asked Questions Table of Contents TOPIC PAGE General 2 Responsibility for Conducting Appraisals 4 Frequency 5 Competency Statements 6 Annual Learning Plan 7 Scheduling
TEACHER PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL. Technical Requirements Manual
TEACHER PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Technical Requirements Manual 2010 This publication is available on the Ministry of Education s website at www.edu.gov.on.ca. Une publication équivalente est disponible en
Sample Completed Summative Report Form for a Secondary Teacher 1*
Sample Completed Summative Report Form for a Secondary Teacher 1* This form must be used for each performance appraisal. The duties of the principal may be delegated to a vice-principal in the same school,
POLICY. Principal/Vice Principal Selection Process
POLICY HR6 Principal/Vice Principal Selection Process Board Received: January 30, 2012 Review Date: February 2015 Policy Statement: It is the policy of the Grand Erie District School Board to select and
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FOR MIDDLE MANAGEMENT
BOARD PROCEDURE Approval Date 2010 Review Date 2015 Contact Person/Department Human Resources Administrator Replacing All previous policies Page 1 of 12 Identification HR-4540 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FOR
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROFESSIONAL STUDENT SERVICES PERSONNEL (PSSP)
BOARD PROCEDURE Approval Date 2015 Review Date 2020 Contact Person/Department Human Resources Administrator Replacing All previous procedures Page 1 of 20 Identification HR 4525 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROFESSIONAL
Induction Elements Manual
Induction Elements Manual 2010 Contents 1 Introduction..................................................... 3 1.1 The New Teacher Induction Program (Amended 2010)............... 3 1.2 New Teacher Induction
MATTOON COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT #2 SCHOOL SOCIAL WORKER EVALUATION PROCEDURES AND FORMS
MATTOON COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT #2 SCHOOL SOCIAL WORKER EVALUATION PROCEDURES AND FORMS Revised 07/03/12 By David R. Skocy, Ph.D. Purpose: NON-TENURED SCHOOL SOCIAL WORKER EVALUATION PROCEDURES
Supervision and Appraisal for School-based Teaching Staff Policy
1. Background 2. Guiding Principles 3. Definitions 4. Teacher Appraisal 5. Roles and Responsibilities 6. Documentation Appendix A Nova Scotia Education Act, Section 26 Duties 1. Background Through section
I. THE PLAN. Init.10/10
I. THE PLAN Professional employees will be grouped into four categories, or STAGES. Teacher evaluation occurs through a variety of activities: (1) required supervisory activities, (2) personalized supervisory
National Board for Professional Teaching Standards Certification Incentive Program
Certificated Personnel BP 4112.2(a) CERTIFICATION The Superintendent or designee shall ensure that persons employed in positions requiring certification qualifications have the appropriate credential or
Parent s Guide to SPECIAL EDUCATION
Parent s Guide to SPECIAL EDUCATION Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board Special Education 1 MESSAGE TO PARENTS The Mission of the Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board, in partnership with
PERSONNEL SERVICES Regulation 4610
PERSONNEL SERVICES Regulation 4610 Performance Evaluation Instructional Staff Performance Evaluation Philosophy of Evaluation A performance-based evaluation system is critical to improving teaching, thus
Fridley Alternative Compensation Plan Executive Summary
Fridley Alternative Compensation Plan Executive Summary Fridley School District Alternative Compensation Plan is a district wide program that is approved by the Minnesota Department of Education and was
Mississippi Statewide Teacher Appraisal Rubric M-STAR
Mississippi Statewide Teacher Appraisal Rubric M-STAR Introduction and Process Guide May 2012 2192_05/12 Contents Introduction... 1 Purpose of Teacher Performance Evaluation... 1 Teacher Evaluation Process...
ROCORI Schools Professional Development Program (PDP)
ROCORI SCHOOLS ISD 750 ROCORI Schools Professional Development Program (PDP) To be central Minnesota s public education standard of excellence A joint agreement between Education Minnesota-ROCORI and ISD
THE SCHOOL BOARD OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TEACHER PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM, 2014-2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS
, 2014-2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Purpose and Key Components... 1 1. Core of Effective Practices... 1 2. Student Growth... 2 3. Evaluation Rating Criteria... 13 4. Teacher and Principal Involvement... 14 5.
6.9 6.9.1. GRADING SYSTEMS
6.9 The professional staff will develop a program of studies which encourages students to continually strive for self-improvement and success in their academic work. 6.9.1. GRADING SYSTEMS Periodic grade
Self Assessment Tool for Principals and Vice-Principals
The Institute for Education Leadership (IEL) brings together representatives from the principals' associations, the supervisory officers' associations, councils of directors of education and the Ministry
ONTARIO LEADERSHIP STRATEGY. Principal/ Vice-Principal Performance Appraisal
ONTARIO LEADERSHIP STRATEGY Principal/ Vice-Principal Performance Appraisal T E C H N I C A L R E Q U I R E M E N T S M A N U A L 2013 Contents PREFACE...3 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Context: The Ontario Leadership
Consulted with: Ormiston Academies Trust, ASCL, ATL, GMB, NAHT, NASUWT, NUT, Unison and Unite.
Policy name: Managing teacher performance - Appraisal procedure Date consulted on: September 2014 Date for review: August 2015 Author: Ormiston Academies Trust - HR department Consulted with: Ormiston
Rainy River District School Board SECTION 3
Rainy River District School Board SECTION 3 Personnel PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROCEDURE PURPOSE 3.46 The purpose of the performance appraisal is to evaluate job performance in the probationary term for new
Graduate Certification Field Guide
Learning for Tomorrow Teaching for Today School/University Collaboration Graduate Certification Field Guide Block II Student Teaching Boise State University College of Education Fall 2007 2 Table of Contents
EFFECTIVE: November 2014 CROSS-REFERENCE: Halton District School Board School Attendance Manual REVISION DATE: November 2016
Halton District School Board Administrative Procedure TOPIC: Home Schooling EFFECTIVE: November 2014 CROSS-REFERENCE: Halton District School Board School Attendance Manual REVISION DATE: November 2016
Revisioning Graduate Teacher Education in North Carolina Master of Arts in Elementary Education Appalachian State University
Revisioning Graduate Teacher Education in North Carolina Master of Arts in Elementary Education Appalachian State University A. A description of how the proposed program has been revisioned to reflect
Performance Evaluation System Protocol. Licensed Executive Professionals
Colorado Springs School District 11 Dr. Nicholas Gledich, Superintendent Performance Evaluation System Protocol Licensed Executive Professionals Revised March 2014 235169.6 Department of Human Resources
Policy/Program Memorandum No. 142
Date of Issue: December 5, 2012 Effective: Until revoked or modified Subject: Application: SCHOOL BOARD PROGRAMS FOR EXPELLED STUDENTS Directors of Education Supervisory Officers and Secretary-Treasurers
PRINCIPAL POSITION DESCRIPTION
400-20 Administrative Procedure 430 Background PRINCIPAL POSITION DESCRIPTION The Principal is responsible for overall supervision and operation of his/her individual school. This responsibility includes
Essential Principles of Effective Evaluation
Essential Principles of Effective Evaluation The growth and learning of children is the primary responsibility of those who teach in our classrooms and lead our schools. Student growth and learning can
Chapter 8a Public Education Human Resource Management Act. Part 1 General Provisions
Chapter 8a Public Education Human Resource Management Act Part 1 General Provisions 53A-8a-101 Title. This chapter is known as the "Public Education Human Resource Management Act." 53A-8a-102 Definitions.
Model for Practitioner Evaluation Manual SCHOOL COUNSELOR. Approved by Board of Education August 28, 2002
Model for Practitioner Evaluation Manual SCHOOL COUNSELOR Approved by Board of Education August 28, 2002 Revised August 2008 Model for Practitioner Evaluation Guidelines and Process for Traditional Evaluation
Bluewater District School Board ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE AP 6225-D Students Page 1
Students Page 1 Procedure Title Home Schooling Date of Issue February 10, 1999 Related Policy Revision Dates March 30, 2005 October 20, 2010 November 14, 2012 Related Forms AF 6225 AF 6226 AF 6227 AF 6228
Individual Education Plan (IEP)
Individual Education Plan (IEP) THIS IEP CONTAINS AC MOD ALT REASON FOR DEVELOPING THE IEP Student identified as exceptional by IPRC Student not formally identified but requires special education program/services,
PROCEDURES MANUAL. retained in the Professor s personnel file in Human Resources.
PA-12 CANADORE COLLEGE PROCEDURES MANUAL FACULTY PERFORMANCE REVIEW Procedures 1. Introduction 1.1. The Vice President Academic implements the Faculty Performance Review process by providing leadership,
Master of Teaching (Primary) Primary Professional Experience 1. Professional Experience Handbook
Master of Teaching (Primary) Primary Professional Experience 1 Professional Experience Handbook The University of Queensland 2015 The University of Queensland - School of Education M Teach - Primary Professional
Curriculum Manager Motor Vehicles Job Description
Curriculum Manager Motor Vehicles Job Description Responsible To: Responsible For: Campus: Head of Department Curriculum Staff Southgate Campus Context The curriculum at Barnet and Southgate College is
GaPSC Teacher Leadership Program Standards
GaPSC Teacher Leadership Program Standards Purpose: Georgia has identified a need to improve P-12 students academic performance as measured by various assessments. One method to ensure improved student
AMPHITHEATER SCHOOL COUNSELOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM. Amphitheater Public Schools 701 W. Wetmore Road Tucson, AZ 85705
AMPHITHEATER SCHOOL COUNSELOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM Amphitheater Public Schools 71 W. Wetmore Road Tucson, AZ 8575 Revised 215 GOVERNING BOARD Deanna M. Day, M.Ed., President Jo Grant, Vice President
Performance-Based Evaluation Handbook
Baltimore City Public School System Performance-Based Evaluation Handbook Department of Professional Development Performance-Based Evaluation October 2003 PBES Handbook (Revised 2003) i Table of Contents
Supervised Student Teaching Experience for All Education Majors
Supervised Student Teaching Experience for All Education Majors Additional requirements may be expected in each individual education program. Please see your University Supervisor for more information.
James Rumsey Technical Institute Employee Performance and Effectiveness Evaluation Procedure
James Rumsey Technical Institute Employee Performance and Effectiveness Evaluation Procedure James Rumsey Technical Institute, a West Virginia state institution, is bound by Policy 5310, Performance Evaluation
Teacher Performance Evaluation System
Chandler Unified School District Teacher Performance Evaluation System Revised 2015-16 Purpose The purpose of this guide is to outline Chandler Unified School District s teacher evaluation process. The
Ministry of Education. Standards for School Boards Special Education Plans
Ministry of Education Standards for School Boards Special Education Plans 2000 CONTENTS Introduction................................................ 3 The Board s Consultation Process................................
Jolie Wineroth, Executive Director Human Resources
HUMAN RESOURCES Jolie Wineroth, Senior Executive Director 555 Franklin Street, San Francisco, CA 94102-5299 (415) 241-6144 Fax (415) 241-6147 E-Mail: [email protected] September, 2008 MEMORANDUM TO:
SPECIAL EDUCATION. you actively participate in the decisions made about your child s education; and
SPECIAL EDUCATION Meeting the needs of students with disabilities and behaviour problems is one of the most difficult challenges facing the public education system in Ontario. The laws governing public
Colorado Professional Teaching Standards
Colorado Professional Teaching Standards Standard I: Teachers demonstrate knowledge of the content they teach a. Teachers provide instruction that is aligned with the Colorado Academic Standards and their
Evaluation System for Classified & Management Support Staff
Evaluation System for Classified & Management Support Staff August 2012 Grant Wood Area Education Agency extends equal opportunities in its employment practices, educational programs and services, and
Oak Park School District. Administrator Evaluation Program
Oak Park School District Administrator Evaluation Program Table of Contents Evaluation Purpose...1 Evaluation Timeline...2 Rubric for Instructional Administrator Standard 1...3 Standard 2...5 Standard
Teacher Evaluation Plan and Handbook Of Procedures. Mr. Arne Duncan Chief Executive Officer Chicago Public Schools
Teacher Evaluation Plan and Handbook Of Procedures Mr. Arne Duncan Chief Executive Officer Chicago Public Schools CONTENTS Introduction 3 Educational Roles 3 Teacher Long-Range Plans 4 Classroom Teachers
Participant Guidebook
Participant Guidebook Module 1 Understand Teacher Practice Growth through Learning s Module 1 Understand Teacher Practice Guidebook 1 Participant Guidebook Overview Based upon successful completion of
Preparing for the Vice-Principal Selection Process
Preparing for the Vice-Principal Selection Process 2014-15 Education Centre Aurora, 60 Wellington Street West, Aurora, Ontario, L4G 3H2 MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR Dear Colleagues: Congratulations on aspiring
GLOBAL-READY TEACHER COMPETENCY FRAMEWORK: STANDARDS AND INDICATORS
GLOBAL-READY TEACHER COMPETENCY FRAMEWORK: STANDARDS AND INDICATORS GLOBAL-READY TEACHER COMPETENCY FRAMEWORK All learners whether adult or child acquire the attitudes, skills and knowledge needed for
MARZANO SCHOOL LEADERSHIP EVALUATION MODEL
TEACHER & LEADERSHIP EVALUATION MARZANO SCHOOL LEADERSHIP EVALUATION MODEL Prepared by Learning Sciences Marzano Center Center for Teacher and Leadership Evaluation April 2012 1 TEACHER & LEADERSHIP EVALUATION
School Psychologist Evaluation
School Psychologist Evaluation Administrative Procedure 2.C.260 Board Governance Policy Cross Reference: 1, 2, 3, 4, 12, 13, 16 Legal Reference: Date Adopted: Date Amended: The Evergreen School Division
GRAND ERIE DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
GRAND ERIE DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD ANNUAL REVIEW OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PLAN July 31, 2015 Reflecting the 2014-2015 School Year TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1. The Board s Consultation Process... 1 Section 2.
Bachelor of Education Dual Degree Program or Graduate Diploma in Education (Secondary) (EDUC4715 or EDUC6615) Professional Practice
Bachelor of Education Dual Degree Program or Graduate Diploma in Education (Secondary) (EDUC4715 or EDUC6615) Professional Practice Professional Experience Handbook The University of Queensland 2016 Preface
Optional Teacher Professional Development Plan (PDP) Template and Sample PDP
Optional Teacher Professional Development Plan (PDP) Template and Sample PDP This optional individual teacher PDP template is provided to assist teachers, educational services staff, and supervisors in
Model for Practitioner Evaluation Manual SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST. Approved by Board of Education August 28, 2002
Model for Practitioner Evaluation Manual SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST Approved by Board of Education August 28, 2002 Revised August 2008 Model for Practitioner Evaluation Guidelines and Process for Traditional
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards For every student in North Carolina, a knowledgeable, skilled compassionate teacher...a star in every classroom. As Approved by the State Board of Education
CHAPTER 77 STANDARDS FOR TEACHER INTERN PREPARATION PROGRAMS
Ch 77, p.1 CHAPTER 77 STANDARDS FOR TEACHER INTERN PREPARATION PROGRAMS 281 77.1(256) General statement. Programs of teacher intern preparation leading to licensure in Iowa are subject to approval by the
CITY OF ST. CHARLES SCHOOL DISTRICT PERFORMANCE-BASED GUIDANCE COUNSELOR EVALUATION
CITY OF ST. CHARLES SCHOOL DISTRICT GUIDE TO PERFORMANCE-BASED GUIDANCE COUNSELOR EVALUATION Board Review April 2009 Table of Contents Topic Page Statutory Authority for Performance-Based... 1 Philosophy...
SPECIAL EDUCATION PLAN 2015
SPECIAL EDUCATION PLAN 2015 Also available at www.wcdsb.ca Page 1 Table of Contents Introduction... 3 Section 1: The Board s Consultation Process... 4 Section 2: The Board s General Model for Special Education...
Board Leadership Development Strategy- Feb 2012
Board Leadership Development Strategy- Feb 2012 Superior-Greenstone District School Board believes both leadership and excellence are important at all levels within the organization and contributes to
Administrative Procedure Manual Human Resources: Evaluations Secretary AP: 209C
Name: School: Employment Date: Length of time in present position: Performance Appraisal Date: Appraiser Name & Position: Note: Additional bullets can be used to adapt the evaluation for mutually agreed
Section XVII. School Admission
Section XVII. School Admission 123 124 125 126 127 128 FORMS 129 Student s Contract for Alcohol Abuse Policy Violation First Offense Policy A Student s Contract for Alcohol Abuse Policy Violation First
Masters Comprehensive Exam and Rubric (Rev. July 17, 2014)
1 Educational Leadership & Policy Studies Masters Comprehensive Exam and Rubric (Rev. July 17, 2014) The comprehensive exam is intended as a final assessment of a student s ability to integrate important
Student Teaching Handbook
Framingham State University Framingham, Massachusetts Student Teaching Handbook to be used in conjunction with MA DESE Candidate Assessment of Performance (CAP) for the following Initial licensure programs:
Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness System. Teacher Evaluation Process Manual
Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness System Teacher Evaluation Process Manual Updated February 2016 This manual is an interim update to remove inaccurate information. A more comprehensive update for 2016-17
Counselor Performance Evaluation
Counselor Performance Evaluation Building Tomorrow Today Jackson Public School District 662 S. President Street Jackson, Mississippi 39201 INTRODUCTION The Jackson Public School District has developed
Catholic Independent Schools Of Vancouver Archdiocese THE HIRING PROCESS
Catholic Independent Schools Of Vancouver Archdiocese THE HIRING PROCESS Contents Mission Statement 3 Introduction 4 Summary of Hiring Process 4 Selection Process 6 Informing Successful Applicants 6 The
North Carolina TEACHER. evaluation process. Public Schools of North Carolina State Board of Education Department of Public Instruction
North Carolina TEACHER evaluation process Public Schools of North Carolina State Board of Education Department of Public Instruction Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina Teachers ( This form should be
Leader Keys Effectiveness System Implementation Handbook
Leader Keys Effectiveness System Implementation Handbook Office of School Improvement Teacher and Leader Keys Effectiveness Division Acknowledgments The s (GaDOE) (LKES) Handbook was developed with the
Recruiting, Selecting and Hiring TAP Leaders
Recruiting, Selecting and Hiring TAP Leaders Tap Recruitment Process Overview Sample Job Advertisement for Master/Mentor Teachers Sample Recruitment Flier for Master/Mentor Teachers Sample Meeting Agenda
SUPERVISORY OFFICERS. Certification, Appointment and Notice of Suspension / Dismissal. A Guide to Legislative Requirements and Ministry Procedures
SUPERVISORY OFFICERS Certification, Appointment and Notice of Suspension / Dismissal A Guide to Legislative Requirements and Ministry Procedures Ministry of Education Leadership Development Branch December
Toronto District School Board
Toronto District School Board Title: HOME SCHOOLING Adopted: June 5, 2000 Revised: January 24, 2001, January 16, 2003, June 17, 2008 Authorization: EPP Operational Procedure PR.553 1.0 OBJECTIVE To provide
TEACHER PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
201 TEACHER PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM Observation and Evaluation Forms and Procedures for Instructional Practice Effective July 1, 201 A Comprehensive System for Professional Development and Annual
NC TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS SAMPLE EVIDENCES AND ARTIFACTS
STANDARD I: ELEMENT A: Teachers demonstrate leadership Teachers lead in their classroom Developing Has assessment data available and refers to it to understand the skills and abilities of students Accesses
UNH Graduate Education Department. Quarterly Assessment Report
First Quarter Assessment Report UNH Graduate Education Department Quarterly Assessment Report First Quarter i First Quarter Assessment Report Table of Contents Introduction... Section - Purpose of the
EXAMPLE FIELD EXPERIENCE PLANNING TEMPLATE CCSU MAT Program
EXAMPLE FIELD EXPERIENCE PLANNING TEMPLATE CCSU MAT Program Secondary Education (Math, History/Social Studies, Science, World Languages) and Special Education (K-12) Goal: The MAT program focuses on preparing
Mississippi Counselor Appraisal Rubric M-CAR
Mississippi Counselor Appraisal Rubric M-CAR 2014-15 Process Manual Last Modified 8/25/14 The Mississippi State Board of Education, the Mississippi Department of Education, the Mississippi School of the
Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness System. Principal Evaluation Process Manual
Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness System Principal Evaluation Process Manual Updated February 2016 This manual is an interim update to remove inaccurate information. A more comprehensive update for 2016-17
Educational Leadership Program
Educational Leadership Program Department of Education St. Lawrence University 2013-2014 Handbook for Educational Leadership St. Lawrence University, Department of Education Introduction Program Goals
TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL
ISBE 23 ILLINOIS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 50 Section 50.10 Purpose 50.20 Applicability 50.30 Definitions TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES : EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION : PERSONNEL
