NSF INNOVATION CORPS (I-Corps)
|
|
|
- Gerald Gardner
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 NSF INNOVATION CORPS (I-Corps) Overview The National Science Foundation (NSF) seeks to develop and nurture a national innovation ecosystem that builds upon fundamental research to guide the output of scientific research toward the development of technologies, products, and processes that benefit society. In order to cultivate a national innovation ecosystem, NSF established the NSF Innovation Corps (I- Corps) in FY The NSF I-Corps' purpose is to support NSF-funded researchers who, with teams, are interested in transitioning their research out of the lab. I-Corps awards are based the on maturity of the effort (i.e. is the research ready to leave the lab), strength of the team, and anticipated market value. The teams selected for I-Corps awards will receive additional support in the form of mentoring and funding to accelerate innovation that can attract subsequent third-party funding. The I-Corps Team grant gives the project team access to resources to help determine the readiness to commercialize technology developed by previously-funded or currently-funded NSF projects. The outcome of the I-Corps projects is threefold: 1) a clear go/no go decision regarding viability of products and services, 2) should the decision be to move the effort forward, a transition plan to do so, and 3) a technology demonstration for potential partners. In FY 2014 NSF will support two additional I-Corps competitions Sites and Nodes to further build, utilize, and sustain a national innovation ecosystem that augments the development of technologies, products, and processes that benefit the Nation. I-Corps Sites are funded at academic institutions, having already existing innovation or entrepreneurial units, to enable them to nurture and support multiple, local teams to transition their ideas, devices, processes or other intellectual activities into the marketplace. The I-Corps Nodes will establish regional nodes to provide training to I-Corps Teams; develop tools and resources that will impact and expand the benefits of the entire I-Corps program within a two to three year timeframe, and identify and pursue longer-term (five+ years) research and development projects. I-Corps has its genesis in many of the long standing innovation ecosystem programs. Most closely related to I-Corps is the Partnership for Innovations (PFI) Accelerating Innovation Research (AIR) program in the Directorate for Engineering (ENG), started in FY The AIR program: encourages the translation of the numerous, technologically-promising, fundamental discoveries made by NSF researchers, while drawing upon and building the entrepreneurial spirit of the researchers and students; and fosters connections between existing NSF innovation research alliances. Those existing NSF innovation research alliances include consortia such as Engineering Research Centers (ERC), Industry University Cooperative Research Centers (I/UCRC), Partnerships for Innovation (PFI), Science and Technology Centers (STC), Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers (NSEC), Materials Research Science and Engineering Centers (MRSEC), and other institutions. Their complementary focus will spur the development of discoveries into innovative technologies through collaboration. All of these activities are designed to strengthen the U.S. innovation ecosystem. NSF-Wide Investments - 17
2 Innovation Corps Total Funding for I-Corps (Dollars in Millions) Actual Enacted/ Annualized FY 2013 CR FY 2014 Request $6.77 $7.50 $24.85 Goals The goals of the I-Corps program are: to build on NSF s investment in fundamental research; to offer academic researchers and students an opportunity to learn firsthand about technological innovation and entrepreneurship, and thereby fulfill the promise of their discoveries; and to prepare students for real-world experience through curricular enhancements, and provide them with opportunities to learn about and participate in the process of transforming scientific and engineering discoveries to meet societal needs. Approach NSF's core mission is to fund basic research in all fields of science and engineering. I-Corps supports this mission by helping to transform scientific output into technological innovation. I-Corps will leverage existing funding for programs like Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR), and will utilize additional support from private-sector and regional partners, including universities, industries, venture capitalists, and nonprofits. The partnership with universities will also contribute to the development of novel pedagogical tools. The I-Corps program will also help create a new network that will strategically connect NSF-funded scientists and innovators to the national innovation ecosystem, including direct connections with mentors and potential future investors. Leadership structure and governance: I-Corps is led by a core group of cognizant NSF program officers comprised of representatives from all directorates. The lead program officer is from ENG and is currently detailed to the Office of International and Integrative Activities. In addition to working closely with all subject matter experts within the directorates and offices, the lead program officer and the I-Corps team regularly meet with other federal agency representatives who have expressed interest in implementing similar programs within their own agency. Scope within NSF: Principal Investigators (PIs) from every directorate, previously or currently supported for their research and education activities by NSF, are now benefiting from this educational and financial support through I-Corps. External stakeholders: The primary focus of I-Corps is to help the traditional academic research community better connect with experts in innovation and entrepreneurship, who can in turn help those in the academic community evaluate the commercial viability of their ideas. The program has been well received by future small business interests, the venture capital community, and large established enterprises interested in the intellectual property generated by NSF-supported researchers. NSF-Wide Investments - 18
3 FY 2014 NSF Budget Request to Congress Investment Framework I-Corps Funding by Directorate (Dollars in Millions) Directorate/Office Actual Enacted/ Annualized FY 2013 CR FY 2014 Request Biological Sciences $0.10 $0.50 $2.00 Computer and Information Science and Engineering Education and Human Resources Engineering Geosciences Mathematical and Physical Sciences Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences Total, NSF $6.77 $7.50 $24.85 T otals may not add due to rounding. FY 2011-FY 2013 The Innovation Corps program is a key element in a series of NSF-supported programs concentrating on the innovation ecosystem. As explained above, I-Corps has its genesis in a number of long-standing programs within the NSF that support the innovation ecosystem. In FY 2011 and, investments in the inaugural year for I-Corps complemented these long-standing investments in programs, such as ERC, I/UCRC, PFI, STC, NSEC, and MRSEC. All of these programs are built on the backbone of support for core research, primarily to individual investigators, found in every directorate at NSF. The I-Corps program is comprised of three elements, namely: Financial support to the team for the development of a prototype or a proof of concept; A specific structure for the I-Corps team, comprised of a principal investigator, an entrepreneurial lead, and an innovation/entrepreneurial mentor; and A strong educational component focusing on a hypothesis-driven approach to developing a methodology for evaluating both the technical merits and the marketability of the concept being proposed. In, the I-Corps program supported 124 Team awards, at $50,000 each, for up to six months. The projects were submitted to NSF in response to NSF solicitation and were reviewed under NSF s standard Grants for Rapid Response Research (RAPID) mechanism. The FY 2013 plan begins with the basic I-Corps structure developed in , the elements of which will not change substantively in Today, a hypothesis-driven approach to evaluating technical and market viability is offered to all I-Corps teams. The I-Corps program delivers this immersive curriculum through regional I-Corps nodes, wherein the hypothesis driven innovation educational offerings for PIs and their teams are developed and provided by the universities involved in these nodes. This approach appears to be very successful and experience to date indicates it provides significant "value added" to the PI and their teams. In FY 2011, there was one I-Corps Node and in, there were two. In FY 2013, NSF is offering opportunities to other universities to develop the curriculum, using the lessons learned in the execution of the I-Corps program NSF-Wide Investments - 19
4 Innovation Corps in FY 2011 and and to compete for more I-Corps Nodes. Recognizing several universities have existing institutional infrastructure and mechanisms to support entrepreneurship within their campuses, NSF plans to launch I-Corps Sites. These sites will provide infrastructure, advice, resources, networking opportunities, training, and modest funding to enable formation of teams that can apply to the I-Corps program. FY 2014 Request NSF will support up to 175 Innovation Team awards to fund NSF-funded researchers who will receive additional support - in the form of mentoring and funding - to accelerate innovation that can attract subsequent third-party funding. Each I-Corps grant provides the project team with resources to determine the readiness to commercialize technology developed by previously-funded or currentlyfunded NSF projects. NSF will support approximately 15 new Innovation Corps Sites in FY NSF provides up to $100,000 per year for three years to established academic institutions that already have existing innovation or entrepreneurial units to nurture and support multiple teams. NSF will support up to three new Innovation Corps Nodes in FY NSF provides $350,000 to $1.25 million per year for up to three years, depending upon the number of institutions involved, to establish regional nodes to provide training, tools, and resources for longer term (5+ years) projects that meet I-Corps program goals. FY 2015 and beyond NSF plans to achieve full-scale integration and dissemination of this program throughout the country, in the FY 2016 FY 2017 timeframe utilizing a regional hub model. Full-scale implementation will likely include approximately 270 I-Corps Teams annually, a steady state of approximately 40 active I-Corps Sites and 10 regional I-Corps Nodes. The intention, from the outset, has been to solicit participation of universities throughout the country in offering these dynamic and powerful curricula for innovation. NSF also anticipates that, in the out years, several I-Corps recipients will apply to the SBIR program. NSF has already seen, in just the short time since launching this program in July of 2011, a significant number (24) of SBIR proposals from among the I-Corps cohorts resulting in 14 SBIR awards. Evaluation Framework I-Corps directly contributes to one of NSF s three Priority Goals for and FY Progress towards Priority Goals is assessed quarterly by agency senior management and reported on the website Performance.gov. The Priority Goal is to increase the number of entrepreneurs emerging from university laboratories. Specifically, the Priority Goal states that by September 30, 2013, 80 percent of teams participating in the Innovation Corps program will have tested the commercial viability of their product or service as evidenced by completion of the I-Corps immersion course, where teams make Go/No-Go decisions about moving forward with commercialization. Additional primary outcomes and milestones for the I-Corps program center on tangible measures that relate directly to the societal application realized from NSF s investments in basic research. For example, successful completion of the I-Corps grant would be expected to contribute to one or more of the following: New start-up businesses, percent of I-Corps recipients; Licensing of patents or trademarks to third parties, 5 percent of recipients; SBIR proposals, percent of recipients; A business plan suitable for review by third-party investors, percent of recipients; NSF-Wide Investments - 20
5 FY 2014 NSF Budget Request to Congress Students prepared to be entrepreneurially competitive, 80 percent of recipients; and New curriculum development or improvement in current curricula focusing on entrepreneurship and innovation. In time, the I-Corps program will have a positive impact on all these measures. Given the high visibility and high community interest in I-Corps, there is naturally going to be close examination almost immediately of the impact of this program on metrics such as these. It may take several years to gather data to see real and substantive outcomes on these measures, and for this reason, approaches to tracking short-term progress also needs to be implemented. Therefore, initial evaluations will focus on input measures primarily, such as level of interest and number of proposals, and the ability to expand the mentor network. Outcome indicators such as start-ups, SBIR submissions, and third party investment will become critical as the program matures. The projected timeline is: : The Foundation established a baseline of Pre I-Corps activities. FY 2013: The Foundation will initiate evaluations and initiate the I-Corps Nodes and I-Corps Sites programs. FY 2014: NSF will continue with regular evaluations of the previously described metrics and develop a chronological database that allows for more detailed historical analysis of program impact. The approach will be similar to that taken with the ERC and I/UCRC programs since NSF-Wide Investments - 21
Stimulating Innovation and Entrepreneurship in US Universities
Stimulating Innovation and Entrepreneurship in US Universities Thomas W. Peterson Provost and Executive Vice Chancellor University of California, Merced 17 October, 2013 CESAER Conference RTWH Aachen Innovation
RFA-OD-14-005: NIH Research Evaluation and Commercialization Hub (REACH) Awards (U01) Kurt Marek, PhD
RFA-OD-14-005: NIH Research Evaluation and Commercialization Hub (REACH) Awards (U01) Kurt Marek, PhD Questions Please enter your questions into the webinar chat console If we do not address your question
SECURE AND TRUSTWORTHY CYBERSPACE (SaTC) $124,250,000 +$1,500,000 / 1.2%
SECURE AND TRUSTWORTHY CYBERSPACE (SaTC) $124,250,000 +$1,500,000 / 1.2% Overview The Secure and Trustworthy Cyberspace (SaTC) investment is aimed at building a cybersecure society and providing a strong
SECURE AND TRUSTWORTHY CYBERSPACE (SaTC)
SECURE AND TRUSTWORTHY CYBERSPACE (SaTC) Overview The Secure and Trustworthy Cyberspace (SaTC) investment is aimed at building a cybersecure society and providing a strong competitive edge in the Nation
CYBERINFRASTRUCTURE FRAMEWORK FOR 21 ST CENTURY SCIENCE, ENGINEERING, AND EDUCATION (CIF21)
CYBERINFRASTRUCTURE FRAMEWORK FOR 21 ST CENTURY SCIENCE, ENGINEERING, AND EDUCATION (CIF21) Overview The Cyberinfrastructure Framework for 21 st Century Science, Engineering, and Education (CIF21) investment
SBIR/STTR Reauthorization: A Review of Technology Transfer
SBIR/STTR Reauthorization: A Review of Technology Transfer Chairwoman Comstock, Ranking Member Lipinski, and members of the Subcommittee on Research and Technology, I am honored by your invitation to present
Tech Launch Arizona. Start-up Guide For New Companies Licensing Technologies Invented at the University of Arizona
Tech Launch Arizona Start-up Guide For New Companies Licensing Technologies Invented at the University of Arizona Contents The Idea-to-Impact Continuum... 1 The TLA Start-up Pathway... 3 1. Investigator:
CYBERINFRASTRUCTURE FRAMEWORK FOR 21 ST CENTURY SCIENCE, ENGINEERING, AND EDUCATION (CIF21) $100,070,000 -$32,350,000 / -24.43%
CYBERINFRASTRUCTURE FRAMEWORK FOR 21 ST CENTURY SCIENCE, ENGINEERING, AND EDUCATION (CIF21) $100,070,000 -$32,350,000 / -24.43% Overview The Cyberinfrastructure Framework for 21 st Century Science, Engineering,
research center concept
research center concept research center concept 1 Overview As a key part of the Russian Skolkovo Initiative, the Skolkovo Foundation, MIT, and others are assisting in the creation of the Skolkovo Institute
Ohio Third Frontier Technology Validation and Start-Up Fund
Ohio Third Frontier Technology Validation and Start-Up Fund Calendar Year 2014 Request for Proposals (RFP) RFP Released June 18, 2014 Cycle 2: o Written Questions through July 30, 2014 o Technology Transfer
NOMINATION OF THE. For the 2010 USASBE Entrepreneurship Education National Award in. Outstanding Specialty Entrepreneurship Program.
NOMINATION OF THE California State University San Bernardino Inland Empire Center for Entrepreneurship (IECE) Integrated Technology Transfer Network Program (ITTN) For the 2010 USASBE Entrepreneurship
Agenda Item 4. Economic Development and Technology Commercialization Monograph
Agenda Item 4 Economic Development and Technology Commercialization Monograph BOARD OF REGENTS SUMMARY OF ITEM FOR ACTION INFORMATION OR DISCUSSION TOPIC: Economic Development and Technology Commercialization
Student Handbook. Online Master s in Entrepreneurship Program
Student Handbook Online Master s in Entrepreneurship Program School of Entrepreneurship Spears School of Business Oklahoma State University http://entrepreneurship.okstate.edu 2012-2013 1 Table of Contents
FY 2016 ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
FY 2016 ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN NSF s FY 2016 Performance Plan reflects NSF s priorities as identified through its planning and budget process. The table below provides a summary of NSF s performance goals
Financing Small Firm Innovation in the United States
Financing Small Firm Innovation in the United States The Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and related programs Ronald S. Cooper, PhD Office of Technology Background: National Policy Shift 1950s-1960s
COGNITIVE SCIENCE AND NEUROSCIENCE
COGNITIVE SCIENCE AND NEUROSCIENCE Overview Cognitive Science and Neuroscience is a multi-year effort that includes NSF s participation in the Administration s Brain Research through Advancing Innovative
SBA Office of Investment & Innovation SBIR-STTR Presentation John Williams Director of Innovation and Technology John.Williams1@sba.
Office of Investment and Innovation SBA Office of Investment & Innovation SBIR-STTR Presentation John Williams Director of Innovation and Technology [email protected] SBA-HQ MARCH 2015 Office of Investment
San Diego State University Strategic Plan: Economic Development Working Group Report. Introduction
San Diego State University Strategic Plan: Economic Development Working Group Report Introduction By celebrating and expanding existing partnerships among all SDSU s service communities, and continuing
PROPOSED ACTION PLAN FOR GUIDING ASPIRATION #6 LEAD IN INNOVATION, ENTREPRENEURSHIP, AND CREATIVITY, (CIE)
PROPOSED ACTION PLAN FOR GUIDING ASPIRATION #6 LEAD IN INNOVATION, ENTREPRENEURSHIP, AND CREATIVITY, (CIE) UTA values and will encourage a culture of innovation, entrepreneurship, and creativity. We will
Entrepreneurship at Princeton
Entrepreneurship at Princeton A statement by President Christopher L. Eisgruber and Provost David S. Lee Recently, an advisory committee on Princeton entrepreneurship submitted a report to us that described
Purdue University Department of Computer Science West Lafayette, IN Strategic Plan 2010-2015
Purdue University Department of Computer Science West Lafayette, IN Strategic Plan 2010-2015 Final Version 5.0: May 3, 2010 Computer science is a discipline that involves the understanding and design of
The University of British Columbia
L information suivante est tirée de la déclaration d intention soumise à la Fondation de la famille J.W. McConnell en réponse à l appel de propositions lancé par RECODE au printemps 2014. The University
Venture Development Fund Request for Proposals
Venture Development Fund Request for Proposals Summary Oregon State University seeks to facilitate the further development of OSU applied innovations and commercialization. The purpose of this RFP is to
Mahendra Jain [email protected]
Kentucky: Encouraging New Entrepreneurs Mahendra Jain [email protected] www.kstc.com http://ksef.kstc.com The National Academies: Learning from Each Other: U.S. and European Perspectives on SB Innovation
Merit Review Broader Impacts Criterion: Representative Activities
Merit Review Broader Impacts Criterion: Representative Activities Proposals submitted to the National Science Foundation are evaluated through use of two merit review criteria, which all proposals must
CYBERINFRASTRUCTURE FRAMEWORK FOR 21 st CENTURY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING (CIF21)
CYBERINFRASTRUCTURE FRAMEWORK FOR 21 st CENTURY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING (CIF21) Goal Develop and deploy comprehensive, integrated, sustainable, and secure cyberinfrastructure (CI) to accelerate research
CooperVision Science and Technology Award Program FY2015
CooperVision Science and Technology Award Program FY2015 Introduction CooperVision brings a refreshing perspective to vision care with a commitment to crafting a wide range of high quality contact lens
Corporate Prospectus January 2015
Corporate Prospectus January 2015 1000 Morris Ave, STEM Bldg., Union, NJ 07083 Tel: (908) 737-1922 Fax: (908) 737-1924 www.ilsebio.com The Institute for Life Science Entrepreneurship (ILSE) is a regional
The DHS Small Business Innovation Research Program: Engaging Small Businesses to Meet DHS Needs and Achieving Results
The DHS Small Business Innovation Research Program: Engaging Small Businesses to Meet DHS Needs and Achieving Results Thomas A. Cellucci, Ph.D., MBA Director, Office of Public-Private Partnerships Science
NSF Programs that Support STEM Education
NSF Programs that Support STEM Education Karen Crosby & Gül Kremer Program Officers NSF Education and Human Resources Directorate (EHR) HBCU-UP/CREST PI Meeting February 19 th -20 th STEM Organization
AUTM U.S. Licensing Activity Survey: FY2014
AUTM U.S. Licensing Activity Survey: FY2014 FY2014 Licensing Activity Survey AUTM s survey data show impressive gains: Record number of U.S. Patents issued Continuing increase in startups launched Growth
Executive Summary... 3 Preamble... 4 Mission... 5 Vision... 5 Values... 5 Research... 6 Education... 8 Community and Clinical Partnerships...
Table of Contents Executive Summary... 3 Preamble... 4 Mission... 5 Vision... 5 Values... 5 Research... 6 Education... 8 Community and Clinical Partnerships... 10 Stony Brook University School of Nursing
1EVALUATION AND TYPES OF EVALUATION 1. REASONS FOR CONDUCTING EVALUATIONS
Section 1EVALUATION AND TYPES OF EVALUATION 1. REASONS FOR CONDUCTING EVALUATIONS The notion of evaluation has been around a long time in fact, the Chinese had a large functional evaluation system in place
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN Prepared for the Lubbock Economic Development Alliance November 2014 TIP STRATEGIES PAGE 1 INTRODUCTION This strategic plan will guide Lubbock s economic development
Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) & Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) Seminar
Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) & Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) Seminar Cheryl Vickroy, MBA Director, Business Development and Technology Transfer March 3, 2011 Wisconsin Entrepreneurs
Curriculum Innovation Driven by Industry Input
Curriculum Innovation Driven by Industry Input Walter W. Buchanan Texas A&M University College Station, Texas Ali Mehrabian Daytona State College Daytona Beach, Florida Introduction Examples are covered
354 Russell Senate Office Building 724 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 Washington, D.C. 20510
The Honorable Cory Gardner The Honorable Gary Peters 354 Russell Senate Office Building 724 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 Washington, D.C. 20510 30 October 2015 Dear Senators Gardner
STRATEGIC PLAN 2012-2016 Office of Research, Innovation and Economic Development OUR FOUNDATION
STRATEGIC PLAN 2012-2016 Office of Research, Innovation and Economic Development OUR FOUNDATION NC STATE MISSION: As a research-extensive land-grant university, North Carolina State University is dedicated
OVERVIEW. AMT The Association For Manufacturing Technology 07/11
NEW JERSEY New Jersey Commission on Science and Technology PO Box 832 Trenton NJ 08625-0832 (609) 984-1671 (609) 292-5920 FAX http://www.state.nj.us/scitech [email protected] OVERVIEW NJCST, established
Indiana Economic Development Corporation
Indiana Economic Development Corporation 21 st Century Research and Technology Fund SBIR/STTR Handbook 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Page 3 About the IEDC and the 21 st Century Fund Page 3 History of
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: ACADEMIC STRATEGIC PLAN
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: ACADEMIC STRATEGIC PLAN These are extraordinary times for higher education and for students aspiring to succeed in a rapidly changing world. Technology is affecting the way we learn
Keys To IP Collaborations With Universities: Part 3
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 [email protected] Keys To IP Collaborations With Universities: Part
DRAFT * Statewide Strategic Plan for Science * DRAFT DRAFT * For Board of Regents Discussion * DRAFT. Mission
Preamble The Statewide Strategic Plan for Science serves as a planning and implementation guide to support newly adopted P-12 science learning standards. The strategic plan begins with mission and vision
School of Nursing. Strategic Plan
School of Nursing Strategic Plan 2010 to 2015 Table of Contents Executive Summary...2 Preamble...4 Mission...6 Vision...6 Values...6 Research...8 Education...10 Community and Clinical Partnerships...12
Recommend # (Best practice reference) Task. Group
Recommend # Group 1 1. Culture 2 1. Culture 3 1. Culture 4 1. Culture 5 1. Culture 6 1. Culture Task (Best practice reference) (a, b, c, d, e, f) Identify a handful of regions known for their entrepreneurial
The Economic and Programmatic Impacts of the Maryland Technology Development Corporation on the Maryland Economy
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Economic and Programmatic Impacts of the Maryland Technology Development Corporation on the Maryland Economy PREPARED BY: Battelle Technology Partnership Practice PREPARED FOR: The
University of Minnesota Start-up Guide
University of Minnesota Start-up Guide Office for Technology Commercialization (OTC) - Venture Center A guide for faculty, staff, and entrepreneurs interested in starting a new business based on University
EXCELLENCE AND DYNAMISM. University of Jyväskylä 2017
EXCELLENCE AND DYNAMISM University of Jyväskylä 2017 Approved at the University Board Meeting of 25 March 2010 FOREWORD The compilation of a University Strategy extending until 2017 could hardly have
RE AP QUE PLIC FOR IONS. Compa CPRIT RFA C 12 FORM 2. Company. p.1/17
RE AP QUE ST PLIC AT RFA C 12 FORM 2 FOR IONS Compa any Formation Awards FY 2012 Fiscal Year Award Period September 1, 2011 Augustt 31, 2012 CPRIT RFA C 12 FORM 2 (Rev 6/ /30/11) Company Formation Awards
Alain Schmitt Directorate General for Enterprise October 14 th, 2014
Alain Schmitt Directorate General for Enterprise October 14 th, 2014 I. Facts and figures about innovation in France II. Startup financing III. Entrepreneurship culture and ecosystems Worldwide ranking
How To Fund Youth Entrepreneurship Partnerships
Youth Entrepreneurship Partnerships (YEP) Call for Proposal Building a Vibrant Youth Entrepreneurship Ecosystem 1.0 Context The Youth Entrepreneurship Partnerships (YEP) program supports projects that
Dr. James R. Lumpkin, Dean
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY College of Business Louisiana Tech University Dr. James R. Lumpkin, Dean EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Overview Louisiana Tech University The Industrial Institute and College of Louisiana was founded
Blackstone Charitable Foundation. Request for Proposal for Organizational Grants
Blackstone Charitable Foundation Request for Proposal for Organizational Grants July 2013 Table of Contents I. Purpose... 2 II. Background... 4 III. Grant Areas... 6 IV. Proposal Guidelines... 8 V. Information
STARTUP INCUBATORS AND ACCELERATORS
Brought to you by Aird & Berlis LLP STARTUP INCUBATORS AND ACCELERATORS BRIGHTSPARK VENTURES Brightspark Ventures is a nextgeneration venture capital firm based in Canada that invests to build and grow
How to set up a successful university startup incubator
How to set up a successful university startup incubator October 2014 Company Proven infactories the US as a model for nurturing young companies, start-up incubators are now thriving in Europe. But is there
How to set up a successful university startup incubator
How to set up a successful university startup incubator November 2014 Company Proven infactories the US as a model for nurturing young companies, start-up incubators are now thriving in Europe. But is
What is an Innovation Ecosystem? By Deborah J. Jackson. National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA
What is an Innovation Ecosystem? By Deborah J. Jackson National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA The analogy with biological ecosystems One expects there to be a conceptual analogy between an innovation
Introducing Entrepreneurship and Innovation to Engineering Students Utilizing a Mobile App Development Tool
Paper ID #11974 Introducing Entrepreneurship and Innovation to Engineering Students Utilizing a Mobile App Development Tool Dr. Rolfe Josef Sassenfeld, New Mexico State University Dr. Rolfe Sassenfeld,
Office of Research Strategic Plan November 4, 2013
Office of Research Strategic Plan November 4, 2013 SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY Vision: As a leading land-grant university, South Dakota State University will champion the public good through engaged
Workforce Development for Teachers and Scientists Funding Profile by Subprogram and Activity
Activities at the DOE Laboratories Funding Profile by Subprogram and Activity FY 2012 Current (dollars in thousands) FY 2013 Annualized CR* Request Science Undergraduate Laboratory Internships 6,500 7,300
Technology Incubation. Director Technology Incubation Center UET, Peshawar
Technology Incubation Director Technology Incubation Center UET, Peshawar, Outline Background Definition Technology Incubation Role of University Incubation Models in other countries TIC at KP UET Elements
Strategic Business and Operations Framework Understanding the Framework June 30, 2012
Strategic Business and Operations Framework Understanding the Framework June 30, 2012 Table of Contents The Pathway to Success: The Strategic Business and Operations Framework... 3 What is the Strategic
